Literacy, innumeracy, and knowledge of the cosmos
One of our readers, RLM, asked recently whether we really were reading Charlie and the Chocolate Factory with Edith yet, per her book list to the right, and whether it wasn't a bit young. I should explain.
Edith's insatiable love for stories continues. We count it a mellow day if Tom and I can get into the car and get our seatbelts fastened before she starts clamoring for a story. Her teachers remark on the fact that she would sit still all day as long as someone was reading to her, that she has books memorized after one or two readings, and that when a movie is on she doesn't hear a thing around her. (She also doesn't blink, meaning she comes away from most movies with tears running down her cheeks, which gives an even more exaggerated impression of how invested she is.) When riding in the car, Tom and I try to get her to notice interesting things outside the windows, tell us about her day, or be patient enough to give us until the third stoplight to talk to each other...if only to give ourselves a bit of breathing room. But the demand for stories, in the car and elsewhere, continues apace.
When I'm weary of fairy tales, too tired to invent a Princess Edith story, and drawing a blank on family stories, I sometimes dredge up the plot of a good children's book. It turns out that most of the picture books we read at home don't make for good retelling without the actual book--too little picture-independent action. Longer, more plot-driven tales work best. Enter stories like Charlie and the Chocolate Factory, told from parental memory. Edith often gets hooked on such stories and wants to see the actual books. We get them out of the library, and she studies the cover, then thumbs through, often asking that we start reading on a page with a picture. Then, when she has memorized what is happening in each picture in the book, we'll read a chapter or two from the beginning or from the more interesting sections of the book. She loves when Charlie finds the Golden Ticket, for example.
Already she is exhibiting a greater fondness for fantasy than her mother, who was inclined to stick with real people in real-life situations over magic and fantastical beasts. This past week we introduced Narnia for the first time, and Edith was captivated. She has all the books spread out on her floor and has been poring over the pictures. We've read the first chapter of The Voyage of the Dawn Treader, the first chapter of The Last Battle, and various sections of The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe, the whole narrative arc of which she has taken to retelling. She also informed me that she and Aslan play together sometimes. So we seem to have a new hit, even if we haven't read a whole Narnia book chapter-by-chapter yet.
As for which number was bigger than which each time we put down our cards, she didn't seem to get the concept at all. I tried various ways of presenting it.
"Edith," I said during one round, "if I said you could have seven pieces of cake or eight pieces of cake, which would you rather have?"
"Vanilla," she said.
"But how many?"
"Seven and eight is too many pieces of cake. I'd just have one, so I wouldn't get sick."
The next round I tried,
"Edith, if I told you I would give you three pennies for your piggy bank or nine pennies for your piggy bank, which would you rather have?"
"Mama, you're confusing me up with all these questions. Would you just tell me which number is bigger?"
She's never been one for working at something she didn't get right away.
The only comparison she found easy was between face cards and number cards. I'd told her the people cards were all higher than the number cards in this game, and she got that right away. At the end, she asked if she could have all the face cards so she could organize them into royal families and have the different families visit each other at their respective castles. We pulled them all out, and she started telling stories with them.
As for science education, Edith seems to be taking care of it herself. This weekend she asked us to go on a walk with her in a neighborhood we were visiting for the first time, just to explore. She talked a blue streak as she pointed out houses, examined puddles, and snuck under the low-hanging branches of a huge pine tree to examine it from inside. She kept telling us she wanted to go further and further down the sidewalk because she had never visited this neighborhood before and she liked to explore new places.
But then on the way home in the car she revised her statement. "You know, I have been there before," she amended. We expressed doubt. "Yes I have. Two other times I went under that tree. One time just like this time, and another time I went under, then came out the other side."
"You sound like you are consciously living out string theory, Edith," I observed.
"Yeah, I am," she agreed immediately.


7 comments:
Those are some tricky questions. I figure that Kevin and I help balance out the exposure Hannah gets (we have different areas that we are interested/good at).
For number recognition, try Uno. We have an Elmo Uno set and Hannah has learned matching numbers (and naming numbers) through that.
Honestly? We just go with a combination of what I like (and what J. likes) and what Sam likes. I think this would be a lot trickier if Sam weren't at preschool/daycare all day, but one of the good things about that is that I really don't feel an obligation to explicitly "educate" Sam. We play all kinds of learning games if he's into them, answer questions that he has (usually) seriously and look up answers when we don't know them, and don't worry about stuff that he's not into. For now, anyway. I might feel different about this when he's in 4th or 5th grade, but at age 3-4 I'm happy for him to follow his own bliss(es), especially outside of preschool.
I have wondered about this a bit, too. I - like you, like Edith - am much more drawn to stories than numbers. And, not surprisingly, Matilda seems to be, too. But she likes puzzles, so I try to remember to pull out her number puzzle. But I don't really try all that hard. Like A., I think she gets other stuff in daycare.
But I will admit to feeling a bit of apprehension that she has such a typically gendered preference. I figure Steve will do science-y things with her, though that's not the same as having a female role model for that stuff.
Yay, I got a shout-out on the Edith blog! :) And thanks for a great response to my question. If you need another book with fun pictures and a very entertaining story, may I suggest The Phantom Tollbooth, which as you know is an all-time favorite of mine. You (or I!) can tell Edith all about Milo, the bored boy in his little car, and his friends Tock the Watchdog and the Humbug, and their mission to rescue two princesses, and all the weird and wonderful characters they meet along the way. (Gosh, what a great book!) Plus, it directly addresses your words-vs.-numbers question!
I can't help with the discussion questions, I'm afraid, not being in the parenting club, but I do tend to think one wouldn't want to be too deliberate about home-as-classroom, at least at Edith's age. It sounds like she's getting plenty of good exposure to all kinds of subjects at her school, so far.
Your readers have an insatiable desire for stories too -- about Edith. Keep 'em coming, if it's not too exhausting! :)
Thanks, all. My instinct is also generally not to get overly schoolish at home, especially given the amount of organized activity she already gets at daycare. I think my main concern, since unlike many of you Tom and I don't represent terribly different areas of interest, is that we tend to neglect both basic mathematical skills and a scientific approach to exploration and discovery in the natural world. I want to think about how to make room for and foster those ways of interacting with her world--when they don't come readily to us. Any thoughts from the naturally scientifically curious are welcome!
Hm-- re. getting more science into your lives... As someone whose kid gravitates equally to fiction-based picture books and the kind of mindnumbingly boring nonfiction books about vehicles that somehow manage to get published in vast quantity (and which I cannot force myself to read aloud more than once or twice-- fortunately J. obliges), I can't in good conscience *recommend* that you invest in some of the latter for your story-lover. But such things exist (not just about vehicles, but about any number of subjects) if you want to plump up the science through a familiar medium, and some of them are actually less mind-numbingly boring than others. We recently saw a very cute book about an indoor garden with lots of plant/growth concepts and planting activities, featuring the Linnea character (of Monet's Garden fame). Also PBS Kids, if you're ok with some TV, does a great job introducing scientific concepts with some of the Saturday-AM shows (e.g. Sid the Science Kid). And the little kid's room at our science museum is good too-- not sure what the best local option would be for you there.
Some science-y things Sam likes to do: measuring (length with rulers, volume with cups); observing (Bill the hermit crab in his tank; bugs with magnifying glasses while we rake leaves; etc-- he has always been a "noticing" kind of kid); and then the kinds of things involved in setting up train tracks and moving things around them: geometry, momentum etc.
(I had to think for a minute about that list because it's all stuff that we do not to be explicitly scientific but just in the course of daily life, but then J. and I are like you and Tom in coming from much the same approach as each other; I was glad that Sam's class last year had an extended unit on poetry, because I would never have thought to do something like that with him!)
Sorry this got so long!
Deep questions...
We do some science experiments sometimes. He likes that. There are a zillion books on household experiments at the library. Also, cooking is science exploration. Liam had no interest in drawing until this summer, and then it bloomed. Somethings come in time.
When's Grindy coming?
Post a Comment